Sister Yvonne Ridley vs Brother Sami Yusuf
Sister Yvonne
“Apparently Sami also said one of the selling points of Brand UK was having Muslims in the Metropolitan Police Force! Astafur’Allah! Dude, these are the same cops who have a shoot-to-kill policy and would have gunned down a Muslim last year if they could tell the difference between a Bangladeshi and a Brazilian. This is the same police force that has raided more than 3000 Muslim homes in Britain since 9/11. What sort of life is there on Planet Sami, I wonder? If he is so proud to be British, why is he living in the great Middle Eastern democracy of Egypt?”
Brother Sami
“You are critical of my mention that the Metropolitan Police is inclusive of Muslims. By God, who are you depending on to protect and safeguard our streets? Yes, there is no doubt that the Metropolitan Police have committed a series of grave mistakes and blunders – the recent Forest Gate incident is one such example and the Police must be held fully accountable for their actions. But we as Britons and Muslims have a religious and civic obligation to help maintain a safe and secure Britain. This actually raises serious questions about the participation of British Muslims not just in the Metropolitan Police but in mainstream civil society. We have three options as a community: [1] To assimilate and lose our cultural, ethnic and even religious roots. [2] To ghettoise and divorce ourselves from society and face extermination. [3] To positively integrate and contribute to society whilst remaining loyal to both faith and country. I – like the vast majority Muslims – have chosen option three. We need to build trust and partnerships with civil institutions and engage with them. This path entails that we be active members in our communities and societies; that we participate at all levels of society from politics to sports, from academia to arts, from business to media; that we reserve and exercise the right of dissent and criticism; that we join our fellow citizens in building a safe, peaceful, tolerant and pluralistic society that embodies the values of freedom and justice. Thus I commend you for standing in the last European Elections, General Elections and the recent Council Elections as a candidate in order to get your views heard, to make an impact, and to represent British people – although I hope you have better luck next time. Positive engagement – not anarchist ranting -– is the path we must tread.”
So sister Yvonne points out that it makes no sense for Muslims to join a group that is oppressing Muslims, while brother Sami believes joining the group goes hand in hand with raising the status of Muslims in Britain. Pop quiz hotshot - what happens when you send in Muslim Metro Police to harass Muslims in Britain? This is very poor thinking on the part of brother Sami – surely positive engagement does not have to be defined in terms of how many institutions we enter ourselves into as much as it is the influence we can exert over such instituions. Influencing such organizations without being a part of its body would be a far better solution.
Both put forward provocative questions to one another:
1. Why are you living in Egypt instead of Britain if its so great
2. How can you condemn being on the police force while taking part in politics (this question is implied)?
Round 5 Winner: Sister Yvonne